Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

DC's Very Worst Architecture

  • Sep. 30th, 2008 at 8:21 AM
Mr T in DC


Inspired by the essay that appeared in the New York Times on the subject, I've been thinking about what buildings in Washington DC I'd like to see demolished, and replaced by pretty much anything else. After mulling the choices for a day, my list of terrible DC architecture follows:

1. The Hirschorn Museum - this circular concrete bunker has all the charm of a cinder block, and replaced a perfectly fine old brick building that once stood on the site.

2. The Kennedy Center -  the white, gold and red colors are garish, and the boxy shape is uninspiring. Again, I would have preferred the arts center had simply restored the existing brick buildings of the Heurich Brewery that were originally located there.

3. The FBI Building - I wish they'd just move to a secure campus already, and give the huge lot over to commercial developers. When the FBI building was built, dozens of small businesses were displaced. It would be nice to get a little of that retail back.

4. Department of Energy/HUD/Department of Education - this trio of executive agency office buildings represents an architectural "axis of evil". Walking past any of these brutalist edifices simply deadens the soul.

5. The National Museum of American History - soon to emerge from an interior makeover, nothing can be done to liven up the bland exterior of this 1960s museum. It seems that everything that was built in the 60s and 70s is tainted by bad design or shoddy workmanship. The Fort McHenry flag and other artifacts deserve a better looking home.

There are obviously many, many more buildings that can be added to the list, but that's all I have time for now.

Comments

( 7 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2008 04:56 pm (UTC)
Kennedy Center
You'd demolish the Kennedy Center? ... and would have preferred we leave the carcases of smoke-stacked brick factory buildings in its place? I think I sense someone who doesn't have an iota of taste. I bet you prefer McDonald's over all those fancy-schmancy new restaurants opening up all over DC too! Oh yeah, you must. Look at your comment about 60s and 70s architecture. Have you considered moving back to whatever mid-western city you apparently came from?
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2008 08:21 pm (UTC)
Re: Kennedy Center
I sure would demolish the Kennedy Center! The Heurich Brewery was a beautiful collection of sturdy, brick 19th century buildings. If restored and repurposed for arts use, they would have been magnificent. See the image in this link: http://www.rustycans.com/Graphics/Heurich_Brewery_1.jpg

No, I dislike McDonalds both architecturally, and food-wise. I stand by my comment that 1960s and 70s architecture is pretty bad. I prefer pre-WWII buildings. I've lived in the DC area for 17 years, and grew up on Long Island.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2008 01:31 am (UTC)
right-on,
You definitely hit some of the low-points of federal architecture. Standing on Constitution Avenue between the American History Museum and the Department of Commerce building one can muse about how much the architectural profession seems to have forgotten in forty years.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2008 07:49 am (UTC)
The Christian Science Church at 16th and I. It's a hideous bunker, at war with its surroundings, and the congregation wants to tear it down.

[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Oct. 5th, 2008 01:38 pm (UTC)
Yes!!! Good one - it is a hideous bunker.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2008 02:38 am (UTC)
A few exceptions
A few exceptions:

1. The administration building at the National Arboretum. Derivative and a little threadbare, but I still like it.

2. The 2nd St. entrance of the U.S. Tax Court. One of the few instances I can think of where brutalist monumentality really does evoke ancient forms and have dignity (the rest is awful, though).

I agree that the Army Medical Museum was the superior building, but I don't think the Hirschorn deserves to be lumped in w/monstrosities like the Hoover building - some of the gallery spaces are beautiful, and if the administration showed more imagination in the use of the courtyard and w/the landscaping, the elegance of aspects of the design would be more obvious.

Ryan (rockcreek)





[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Oct. 6th, 2008 11:24 am (UTC)
Re: A few exceptions
Hi Ryan, thanks for chiming in! OK, I agree that the building at the National Arboretum can stay, I like the watery setting with the koi pond.
( 7 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

September 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Tags

Page Summary

Blog Statistics

web page hit counter
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow