Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding

  • Apr. 10th, 2007 at 1:20 PM
Mr T in DC

One of the things that irks me is when a business with a classic, recognizable name changes it to some non-word conjured up by a focus group or marketing firm. The worst example was when regional phone company Bell Atlantic (Bell = phone company, Atlantic = the region) changed its name to Verizon, a meaningless abstraction with no regional identity or history behind it.

Now, Bacon's Information Inc., a venerable publisher of media directories, is changing names to Cision. Can you think of a more soulless corporate moniker than Cision? From their website:
Our new name, Cision, reinforces the distinct but related strength of our worldwide organization. It projects our position as a global leader and our commitment to serving our clients seamlessly.
What does that generic corporate lingo even mean? All it means to me is I have to change a bunch of records at work. I assume years ago someone named Bacon started the company and built it into the reputable name it is/was today. He's probably rolling in his grave as we speak.

I think Amtrak started this trend back in the 70s, though at least the name Amtrak hints at it being a railroad. It started off as Penn Central, Penn from the Pennsylvania Railroad, and Central from the New York Central, the two great railroads of the eastern seaboard. But this is America, and for some reason we don't like continuity in our business institutions. We'd rather make up some misspelled, nonsensical crap. A big thumbs down to Verizon, Cision, Amtrak, Cingular, and the rest of 'em.

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 11:04 am (UTC)
Cision
I would say cision (a derived from decision i assume) has nothing to with PR, so I think it sucks. I'll be sure to post on my blog later next week.

-Geoff Livingston
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 05:45 pm (UTC)
Amtrak is okay with me.... it sounds like the equivalent to "Deutsche Bahn" -- American Rail. But switching from Arthur Anderson to Accenture made no sense to me.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 05:46 pm (UTC)
Also, Cingular always sounds to me like a leukotriene inhibitor (Singulair).
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 05:55 pm (UTC)
Agreed! And pharmaceutical names are a whole other story.

Re: Amtrak, I see what you mean. Maybe if it had the "c" in track it wouldn't bother me as much.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 08:24 pm (UTC)
Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
My understanding is that Cision is based on one of the early founders of their parent group in the UK, a gentleman named Cameron Cision. He sold his stake in the company a few years back, but still has input. Bacon's wanted to both honor him and convey what it was like as a customer using their directories or software. He was recently knighted in England for his vast philanthropic work, and changed his full name to "Sir Cam Cision". Hence the new name...but I could be wrong.
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 08:33 pm (UTC)
Re: Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
Wow, that's pretty amazing, thanks. His last name really does sound made-up by a marketing team. In that case, I withdraw my criticism! Just don't tell me someone is named Verizon or Altria. ;)
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 11th, 2007 11:10 pm (UTC)
Re: Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
Actually - I made that up...I'm saying using Bacon's is about as comfortable as his name is if you say it fast.
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Apr. 12th, 2007 01:26 am (UTC)
Re: Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
D'oh. Mr. T was scammed... it sounded plausible!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 25th, 2007 04:19 pm (UTC)
Re: Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
That was actually a well crafted joke on the name by whomever wrote it - not an effort to feed you false information. Have you still not gotten it? Punch line at the end.
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Apr. 25th, 2007 05:24 pm (UTC)
Re: Another Pointless Corporate Re-Branding
Circumcision, got it. I should have caught it on the first take!
[info]jaimesara wrote:
Apr. 12th, 2007 02:50 am (UTC)
My first thought on the pronunciation was "sissy-on," which is clearly a bad name for any business! But if it's pronounced "sizhin," then the first thing that comes to mind is incision, also probably not a good name for a business (unless they are the ones doing the gouging).

Another awful trend in business names is making what was an abbreviation their official name, and I am now, embarrassingly, drawing a complete blank on any examples.

However, a related phenomenon is unpronounceable strings of letters that appear to have been abbreviations but weren't. E.g., Reebok is apparently now RBK. WTF? (Heh!)
[info]mr_t_in_dc wrote:
Apr. 12th, 2007 05:38 pm (UTC)
"Another awful trend in business names is making what was an
abbreviation their official name"

Absolutely! I'm thinking of KFC, and AARP, which apparently no longer stands for American Assoc. of Retired Persons. Yuck.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jul. 24th, 2007 06:32 pm (UTC)
See blog posting at bottom of this page:
http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/blog/category/pr/page/2/
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

September 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Tags

Page Summary

Blog Statistics

web page hit counter
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow